Legal Opinion

People Ex Rel. v. . Supervisors of Sullivan Co.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided March 31, 1874PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] The relator has a sufficient interest in the question to which this mandamus refers, to entitle him to promote the suit. The object which the writ is brought to secure is one of a merely public character. It is to bring the laws of the State to the actual knowledge of the citizens who are bound to obey them. This is sought to be secured by their publication in each county in the State, in two newspapers of opposite politics, and which fairly represent the two…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Case v. CollinsNew York Supreme Court · 1837
  2. The People v. . HalseyNew York Court of Appeals · 1867
  3. Commercial Bank v. Canal CommissionersCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1832

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Pumpyansky v. . KeatingNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
  2. Kornbluth v. RiceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
  3. State ex rel. Dakota Hail Ass'n v. CareyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1891
  4. People ex rel. Pumpyansky v. KeatingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
  5. People ex rel. Sherrill v. GuggenheimerNew York Supreme Court · 1899

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API