Legal Opinion

People ex rel. Sherrill v. Guggenheimer

New York Supreme Court

Decided August 15, 1899PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Motion by relators for peremptory mandamus.

1Opinion of the CourtMcAdam, J.

The three relators, taxpayers and residents of the borough of Brooklyn, in the city of Hew York, apply for a peremptory writ of mandamus requiring the respondents, who are members of the council of the city of Hew York, to approve and adopt a resolution heretofore adopted by the board of aldermen of said city, for the issue of the city’s corporate stock to the amount of $570,000 to pay the award heretofore made in condemnation proceedings, taken pursuant to chapter 481 of the Laws of .1892 and the act amendatory thereof, to acquire the reservoir, wells, machinery, pipes, franchises and all…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Long Island Water Supply Co. v. BrooklynSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. Union Pacific Railroad v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  3. The People v. . SturtevantNew York Court of Appeals · 1853
  4. People Ex Rel. Board of Commissioners v. BanksNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
  5. People Ex Rel. Otsego County Bank v. Board of Supervisors of Otsego CountyNew York Court of Appeals · 1873

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Sherrill v. GuggenheimerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
  2. Talbot v. Board of EducationNew York Supreme Court · 1939
  3. People ex rel. O'Loughlin v. Board of Estimate & ApportionmentNew York Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Kemp v. Kemp, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Dauphin County1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API