Legal Opinion

Blackford v. Maryland Automobile Insurance

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided December 30, 1981No. Civ. No. K-79-1222Published

1Opinion of the Court

FRANK A.. KAUFMAN, Chief Judge.

Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, plaintiffs,1 unclassified employees of the Maryland Automobile Insurance Fund (hereinafter MAIF) until they were “laid off” on July 1, 1976, seek compensatory and punitive damages, challenging their dismissal from their jobs on due process and equal protection grounds. Federal question jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. .§ 1331 is present.

In July 1976, MAIF, finding it necessary to lay off certain employees, selected the employees to be laid off on the basis of merit. In August 1976, plaintiffs instituted administrative proceedings before…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Fusari v. SteinbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Laymon Wesley Alsbury v. The United States Postal ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
  4. Joseph Cohen v. The United States. John v. Coughlin v. The United States. David M. Goodman v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1966
  5. United States v. One (1) 1973 Ford Ltd, Serial No. 3J66S132017District Court, D. Nevada · 1976

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API