Legal Opinion

Arthur Raymond and Patricia Raymond v. Eli Lilly and Company

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided June 15, 1977No. 76-1300PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Per curiam

Other issues having been resolved by certification to the New Hampshire Supreme Court, the only issue remaining in this appeal is whether the district court properly applied a now undisputed standard to undisputed facts. The undisputed standard formulated by the Supreme Court of New Hampshire is: “A cause of action will not accrue under the discovery rule until the plaintiff discovers or in the exercise of reasonable diligence should have discovered not only that he has been injured but also that his injury may have been caused by the defendant’s conduct.” Raymond v. Eli Lilly and Co., N.H.,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Raymond v. Eli Lilly & Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977
  2. James F. Toal v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
  3. Raymond v. Eli Lilly & Co.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 1976
  4. Local Union 1219 v. United Brotherhood Of Carpenters And Joiners Of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1974
  5. Helene Obolensky v. Raoul Saldana SchmierCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1969

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Christine M. SWEENEY, Plaintiff, Appellee, v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF KEENE STATE COLLEGE Et Al., Defendants, AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1979
  2. Jane Fortin, Etc. v. Commissioner of the Massachusetts Department of Public WelfareCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1982
  3. Patricia Lynch v. Michael S. DukakisCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1983
  4. Anthony v. Abbott LaboratoriesSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1985
  5. Dorothy Williams v. Borden, Inc., and Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1981

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API