Legal Opinion
Raymond v. Eli Lilly & Co.
District Court, D. New Hampshire
Decided May 5, 1976No. Civ. A. 75-80 and 75-81PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BOWNES, District Judge.
In this diversity action, plaintiff, Patricia I. Raymond, alleges that an oral contraceptive medication, C-Quens, manufactured and distributed by defendant, Eli Lilly and Company, caused hemorrhages of the optic nerves in each of her eyes leaving her legally blind. 1 Plaintiff is a resident of Nashua, New Hampshire. Defendant is a corporation which is incorporated in and has its principal place of business in the State of Indiana. The amount in controversy exceeds $10,000. Jurisdiction is conferred by 28 U.S.C. § 1332. '
Defendant has moved for summary…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Railroad Comm'n of Tex. v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Urie v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Lehman Brothers v. ScheinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Meredith v. Winter HavenSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Lopez v. SwyerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1973
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Childs v. HausseckerTexas Supreme Court · 1998
- Raymond v. Eli Lilly & Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977
- Anthony v. Abbott LaboratoriesSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1985
- Dorothy Williams v. Borden, Inc., and Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1981
- City of Manchester v. National Gypsum Co.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 1986
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.