Legal Opinion

CARR v. JEFFERSON DEFINED BENEFIT PLAN

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided August 8, 2024No. 2:23-cv-01822Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ALICE M. CARR : CIVIL ACTION : v. : : ABINGTON MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, : NO. 23-1822 et al. : MEMORANDUM Bartle, J. August 8, 2024 Plaintiff Alice M. Carr, after exhausting internal claims procedures, has sued defendants Thomas Jefferson University (“Jefferson”) and the Jefferson Defined Benefit Plan (“Jefferson Plan”). She claims in Count I of the complaint that she is due pension benefits pursuant to Section 502(a)(1)(B) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1132(a)(1)(B), under…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. GlennSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  5. Heimeshoff v. Hartford Life & Accident Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2013

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API