Legal Opinion

Stroupe v. Truesdell

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 28, 1928PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Stacy, C. J.,

after stating the case: It may be doubted as to whether the plaintiff has alleged or shown facts sufficient to entitle him to insist upon an observance of the restrictions contained in deeds going to make up the defendant’s paper chain of title, even if such restrictions were still subsisting and enforceable; but, however this may be, we think the case is controlled by the decision in Higgins v. Hough, 195 N. C., 652, 143 S. E., 212. There, it was said with respect to a lot in the same locality, that similar or identical restrictions, by reason of the changed conditions, are no…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Starkey v. GardnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  2. Starkey v. . GardnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  3. Higgins v. HoughSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
  4. Higgins v. . HoughSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Shuford v. Asheville Oil CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  2. Franklin v. Elizabeth Realty Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  3. Bass v. . HunterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API