Legal Opinion

Bass v. . Hunter

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 22, 1939PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.

The question for decision is whether the restrictions in. defendant’s paper chain of title are enforceable under the rule applied in Johnston v. Garrett, 190 N. C., 835, 130 S. E., 835, and McLeskey v. Heinlein, 200 N. C., 290, 156 S. E., 489, or unenforceable according tO' the principle announced in Starkey v. Gardner, 194 N. C., 74, 138 S. E., 408, 54 A. L. R., 806; Higgins v. Hough, 195 N. C., 652, 143 S. E., 212; Stroupe v. Truesdell, 196 N. C., 303, 145 S. E., 925; Snyder v. Caldwell, 207 N. C., 626, 178 S. E., 83; Elrod v. Phillips, 214 N. C., 472, 199 S. E., 722.

We think the case is…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Starkey v. GardnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  2. Starkey v. . GardnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  3. Humphrey v. . BeallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  4. Johnston v. . GarrettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  5. McLeskey v. . HeinleinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Brenizer v. . StephensSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  2. Shuford v. Asheville Oil CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  3. Vernon v. R. J. Reynolds Realty Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API