Legal Opinion
Cleveland Ry. Co. v. Public Utilities Commission
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided July 24, 1940No. 28072PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
By the Couet.
The present controversy involves the interpretation of those portions of Section 614-84, General Code, which read:
“(a) The term ‘motor transportation company,’ or ‘common carrier by motor vehicle,’ when used in this chapter, shall include, and all provisions of law regulating the business of motor transportation, the context thereof notwithstanding, shall apply to every cor poration, * * * when engaged, or proposing to engage, in the business of transporting persons or property, or both, or of providing or furnishing such transportation service, for hire * * * for the public in…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- City of Cleveland v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1936
- City of Cleveland v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1938
3Cited by3 opinions
- C. S. O. Elec. Co. v. P. U. C.Ohio Supreme Court · 1946
- Columbus & Southern Ohio Electric Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1946
- Whitfield v. City Bus Lines, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1947