Legal Opinion

Cleveland Ry. Co. v. Public Utilities Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 24, 1940No. 28072PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

By the Couet.

The present controversy involves the interpretation of those portions of Section 614-84, General Code, which read:

“(a) The term ‘motor transportation company,’ or ‘common carrier by motor vehicle,’ when used in this chapter, shall include, and all provisions of law regulating the business of motor transportation, the context thereof notwithstanding, shall apply to every cor poration, * * * when engaged, or proposing to engage, in the business of transporting persons or property, or both, or of providing or furnishing such transportation service, for hire * * * for the public in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. City of Cleveland v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1936
  2. City of Cleveland v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1938

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. C. S. O. Elec. Co. v. P. U. C.Ohio Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Columbus & Southern Ohio Electric Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Whitfield v. City Bus Lines, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API