Legal Opinion

C. S. O. Elec. Co. v. P. U. C.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 24, 1946No. 30536Published

1Opinion of the Court

The Public Utilities Commission filed a motion to dismiss the appeal of the Columbus Southern Ohio Electric Company, the ground upon which such motion was based being that "said company is not a proper party, not a real party in interest (affected by the order of the commission), and has suffered no loss or grievance from the order of the commission * * *."

A consideration of this motion requires a statement of some of the facts developed at the hearing, which are not in controversy. The city of Upper Arlington is on the northern boundary of the city of Columbus; the city of Grandview Heights…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. City of Cleveland v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1936
  2. City of Cleveland v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Cleveland Ry. Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API