Legal Opinion
City of Cleveland v. Public Utilities Commission
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided March 18, 1936No. 25801PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtStephenson, J.
We will pass upon the charges of error contained in the statement seriatim.
The following map in miniature graphically portrays the course and termini of the route complained of:
The case of City of Cleveland v. Public Utilities Commission, is not applicable in any wise to the case before us, as the bus line therein involved was wholly within the city of Cleveland.
We fully agree that the jurisdiction of the Public Utilities Commission of Ohio is statutory only, and that the cases cited by plaintiffs in error support such contention beyond all cavil and this is not disputed by any one. It must…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hodge Drive-It-Yourself Co. v. City of CincinnatiOhio Supreme Court · 1931
- Sylvania Busses, Inc. v. City of ToledoOhio Supreme Court · 1928
- Murphy v. Toledo (City)Ohio Supreme Court · 1923
- City of Columbus v. AlkireOhio Supreme Court · 1935
- City of Nelsonville v. RamseyOhio Supreme Court · 1925
3Cited by10 opinions
- Leavers v. City of CantonOhio Supreme Court · 1964
- City of Cleveland v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1938
- East Ohio Gas Co. v. City of AkronOhio Court of Appeals · 1978
- Cleveland Ry. Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1940
- C. S. O. Elec. Co. v. P. U. C.Ohio Supreme Court · 1946
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.