Legal Opinion

Hannon v. Hilliard

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided February 14, 1885No. 11,952PublishedCited by 11 opinions

From the Grant Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Black, C.

The appellee sued the appellants, who have assigned as error the overruling of their motion for a new trial, in which the causes stated were that the finding was contrary to law; that the finding was not sustained by sufficient evidence, and that the amount of the plaintiff’s recovery was too large.

The appellee sought the foreclosure of two mortgages executed by the appellants, Audley M. Hannon and his wife, ■Sarah E. Hannon. One of the mortgages, that declared on in the first paragraph of the complaint, was executed on the 19th of June, 1869, to the appellee, to secure a promissory…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Rucker v. SteelmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Halstead v. Board of Comm'rsIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  3. Peck v. . MallamsNew York Court of Appeals · 1853
  4. Brown v. AndersonIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  5. German Mutual Insurance v. GrimIndiana Supreme Court · 1869

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Keybank National Ass'n v. NBD BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1998
  2. Roehl v. HaumesserIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Warner v. MarshallIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
  4. State ex rel. Arthurs v. Board of County CommissionersMontana Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Swatts v. BowenIndiana Supreme Court · 1895

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API