Legal Opinion

Quail v. Cole

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 6, 1932No. Docket No. 154, Calendar No. 36,716PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an appeal, prosecuted as of right, by plaintiff, from an order setting aside a default and judgment.

The record shows that application by plaintiff for leave to appeal was denied by this court. Review, if any, is by mandamus and not by appeal.

Counsel invokes the statute, 3 Comp. Laws 1929, § 15491, and Court Rules Nos. 55 and 60 (1931). The statute relates to final judgments, and plaintiff has no judgment, but seeks direction, by this court, to have his judgment reinstated. The mentioned rules, while requiring mandamus to be termed an appeal, do not change the law that it is an…

2Cited by15 opinions

  1. In Re Consolidated Freight Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Cook v. Wolverine Stockyards Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Kirn v. IoorMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
  4. American Eutectic Welding Alloys Sales Co. v. GrierMichigan Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Hensey v. HenseyMichigan Supreme Court · 1951

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API