Legal Opinion

Kirn v. Ioor

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 6, 1934No. Calendar 37,641PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Steere, Retired Justice,

sitting at request of the Chief Justice.

In the above entitled suit defendant and appellant Bessie A. Yeider applies for leave to appeal “in the nature of a mandamus” (pursuant to Court Rule No. 60 [1933]), asking a mandate directing the judge of the Kent county circuit court, in chancery, to set aside his decree in favor of plaintiff and grant a rehearing. This'rule requiring leave to appeal, as applied here, is in all legal import consonant with former practice on application for relief by the original prerogative writ of mandamus. Quail v. Cole, 260 Mich. 642.

Two…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Herman v. Wayne Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Quail v. ColeMichigan Supreme Court · 1932

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Leupe v. LeupeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Walters v. Arenac Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Roberts v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeMichigan Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. Freeman v. RemleyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970
  5. Ahrenberg Mechanical Contracting, Inc v HowlettMichigan Supreme Court · 1996

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API