Legal Opinion
In Re Consolidated Freight Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided December 5, 1933No. Docket No. 65, Calendar No. 37,392PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Mr. Justice POTTER'S opinion herein holds Act No. 212, § 13, and Act No. 312, § 8, Pub. Acts 1931, unconstitutional. These two sections are exactly alike and read:
"The orders of the commission issued under the provisions of this act shall be subject to review by the Supreme Court of the State, both as to the law and the facts, and the statutes, rules and practice on appeals to the Supreme Court from circuit courts in equity cases shall apply to and govern proceedings for such review. The Supreme Court is given jurisdiction to hear and determine such matters made reviewable hereunder."
For…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Mackin v. Detroit-Timkin Axle Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1915
- Jackson v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court · 1861
- City of Traverse City v. Michigan Railroad CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1918
- Attorney General v. NelsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
- Michigan Central Railroad v. Michigan Railroad CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Michigan Consolidated Gas Co. v. Public Service CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1973
- Application of Dakota Transp. Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1940
- Clintonville Transfer Line, Inc. v. Public Service CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1945
- Furstenberg v. Omaha & Council Bluffs Street Railway Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1937
- Jones v. Eastern Michigan MotorbusesMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.