Roth v. Phillips Petroleum Co.
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
GRIMM, Judge.
In this court tried case, Neldarose Roth appeals from the judgment in favor of Phillips Petroleum Company. Roth as lessor, claims that Phillips, as lessee, is not abiding by the terms of the agreement between the two parties. In addition, she also claims that the lease, as written, is ambiguous.
The appeal raises three issues. First, whether the lease is ambiguous, which permits the introduction of parole evidence. The alleged ambiguity is a clause in the contract which uses the word “lessor” where normally the word “lessee” would appear. We hold that this lease is not ambiguous,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Murphy v. CarronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
- Burger v. City of SpringfieldSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
- Fisher v. MiceliSupreme Court of Missouri · 1956
- Herrick Motor Co. v. Fischer Oldsmobile Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1967
- Johnson v. DuensingSupreme Court of Missouri · 1960
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Shawmut Bank Connecticut v. Connecticut Limousine Service, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1996
- Lunceford v. HoughtlinMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005
- Schneider v. Forsythe Group, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1989
- City of St. Peters v. Department of Natural Resources of the State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
- Davis Industrial Sales, Inc. v. Workman Construction Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1993
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.