Legal Opinion

Bogle v. State

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided August 9, 2018No. CC 13C14935; 14C23348, SC S065280 (Control); SC S065247; SC S065085PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDuncan, J.

**457This appeal involves two post-conviction relief cases, which arose out of the same underlying criminal case and have been consolidated for review: Bogle v. State of Oregon , 284 Or. App. 882, 395 P.3d 643 (2017), and Bogle v. Nooth , 284 Or. App. 879, 395 P.3d 644 (2017).

In Bogle v. State , petitioner, who was represented by counsel, filed pro se motions pursuant to Church v. Gladden , 244 Or. 308, 311, 417 P.2d 993 (1966). The motions included a motion for the court to instruct petitioner's counsel to raise an additional ground for relief. The post-conviction court denied the pro se…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. State v. StevensOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Krummacher v. GierloffOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Trujillo v. MaassOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  5. State v. LangleyOregon Supreme Court · 1992

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Gutale v. StateOregon Supreme Court · 2019
  2. Ingle v. MatteucciOregon Supreme Court · 2023
  3. Newmann v. HighbergerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2024
  4. Bacon v. CainCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023
  5. Walton v. MyrickCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API