Legal Opinion
State v. Kraus, C-070428 (8-8-2008)
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided August 8, 2008No. Nos. C-070428, C-070429UnpublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION
{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant Roger Kraus challenges the trial court's decision overruling his motion to suppress. Kraus had been arrested for driving while under the influence and having improper rear lights. He had sought to suppress statements he had made to the arresting officer, as well as the results of field-sobriety and Intoxilyzer tests. The trial court overruled Kraus' motion, and, after Kraus entered pleas of no contest, found Kraus guilty of both offenses. Kraus has raised four assignments of error regarding the trial court's denial of his suppression motion.
{¶ 2} Because the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- State v. BurnsideOhio Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. ElmoreOhio Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. Leonard, C-060595 (6-29-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Cleveland v. Oles (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2017
- Cleveland v. OlesOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
- State v. MillerOhio Court of Appeals · 2025
- State v. RichardOhio Court of Appeals · 2011