State v. Leonard, C-060595 (6-29-2007)
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION.
{¶ 1} Following the denial of his motion to suppress, Timothy Leonard entered a no-contest plea to operating a vehicle under the influence of alcohol, in violation of R.C. 4511.19(A)(1)(a). The trial court accepted the plea, found Leonard guilty of the offense, sentenced him, and entered judgment accordingly.
{¶ 2} In a single assignment of error, Leonard now argues that the trial court erred by denying his motion to suppress.
{¶ 3} Appellate review of a motion to suppress presents a mixed question of law and fact.1 In considering a motion to suppress, the trial court is in the best…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Cleveland v. Oles (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2017
- State v. BrockerOhio Court of Appeals · 2015
- State v. StadelmanOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
- State v. ThompsonOhio Court of Appeals · 2021
- State v. Crowe, 07cac030015 (1-31-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.