Legal Opinion

State v. Elmore

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 13, 2006No. 2004-0041PublishedCited by 168 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLundberg Stratton, J.

{¶ 1} In this appeal, defendant-appellant, Phillip E. Elmore, raises 17 propositions of law. We find one proposition to be meritorious and remand the case to the trial court to resentence Elmore on the noncapital offenses for which he was convicted. We find that none of his other propositions of law has merit and affirm Elmore’s convictions. We have also independently weighed the aggravating circumstances against the mitigating factors and have compared Elmore’s sentence of death to those imposed in similar cases, as R.C. 2929.05(A) requires. We find that the sentence of death imposed in this…

2Cases cited59 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  5. State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court · 1997

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by168 opinions

  1. State v. HunterOhio Supreme Court · 2011
  2. State v. HaleOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  3. State v. DavisOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  4. State v. MaxwellOhio Supreme Court · 2014
  5. State v. PerezOhio Supreme Court · 2009

163 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API