Legal Opinion
Kirsch v. Department of Consumer & Business Services
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided May 9, 2012No. 0807007; A143335Published
1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, C. J.
Petitioner seeks judicial review of a final order in which the director of the Department of Consumer and Business Services (the department) concluded, after a contested case hearing, that the department properly applied ORS 742.005 1 in approving an individual health insurance premium rate increase filed by Regence BlueCross BlueShield of Oregon (Regence) in 2008. On review, petitioner argues that we should reverse the order and rescind the rate increase on one or more of the following grounds: (1) the director’s conclusions that the department properly applied ORS 742.005(3), (4), and (6)…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Califano v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Camp v. PittsSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Armstrong v. Asten-Hill Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
- Drew v. Psychiatric Security Review BoardOregon Supreme Court · 1996
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.