Legal Opinion

Meth v. United Benefit Life Ins.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided September 13, 1951No. Civ. No. 10307PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

McGRANERY, District Judge.

This action was instituted by Joseph Meth to recover benefits claimed under three accident and health policies issued to him simultaneously by the defendant, United Benefit Life Insurance Company. Each policy provided that a disability, to be compensable, must result “from sickness, the cause of which originates more than thirty days after the date of the policy”. Payment for disability was refused -on the ground of “prior origin” of the sickness causing the disability. Subsequent to the filing of the action,. Meth died of his disabling illness and his widow and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Valvoline Oil Co. (Et Al.)Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  2. Heffron v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  3. Borgon v. John Hancock M. Life Ins.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  4. Lederer v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  5. Oliver v. Industrial Health, Accident & Life InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Meth v. United Benefit Life Ins. CoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API