Legal Opinion
Weinberger v. Maplewood Review
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided September 11, 2003No. C7-01-2021PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PAGE, Justice.
This appeal arises from appellant Richard Weinberger’s motion to compel the Maplewood Review and two of its reporters, Jason Tarasek and Wally Wakefield,1 to disclose the identity of certain sources quoted in an article published by the Ma-plewood Review in January of 1997. Weinberger sought the identity of the sources in connection with a lawsuit he brought against Independent School District No. 622, Barbara Hallbrehder, Tim Hickey, Cletus Lipetzky, and Mark Klings-porn (collectively, “the Tartan Defendants”) for defamation. In July 2000, Weinberger served Wakefield…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- American Family Insurance Group v. SchroedlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- New England Land Co. v. DeMarkeySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Wall v. ToomeySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1884
- Funchess v. Cecil Newman Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Dave Thomas v. United Steelworkers Local 1938Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2014
- Andre Pope v. Esa Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
- State v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
- In Re the Cities of Annandale & Maple Lake NPDES/SDS Permit Issuance for the Discharge of Treated WastewaterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
- Dunham v. RoerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.