Legal Opinion

In re Bayer

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided February 2, 1978No. Appeal No. 77-570PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BALDWIN, Judge.

This appeal is from the decision of the Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) Board of Appeals (board), adhered to on reconsideration, affirming the rejection of claims 6, 8, 11-13, 20-25, and 28-37 of appellant’s application serial No. 291,484, filed September 22, 1972, for “Transition MetalNaphthyridine Chemical Complexes.”1 We reverse.

Proceedings in the PTO2

The sole reference relied upon by the examiner and the board is appellant’s thesis entitled “Coordination Complexes of 2-me-thyl-5-hydroxy-l,8-naphthyridine,” to which reference is made in the present application. The thesis…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Sinclair & Carroll Co. v. Interchemical Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Alexander Milburn Co. v. Davis-Bournonville Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. United States v. Garrett Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. The Garrett Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1970
  5. Thomas E. Pickering v. Orval Holman, Thomas E. Pickering v. Orval HolmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Stratoflex, Inc. v. Aeroquip CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
  2. In Re Leo M. HallCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
  3. Richard F. Carella v. Starlight Archery and Pro Line CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
  4. In Re Wilhelm Elsner. In Re Keith W. ZaryCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
  5. Shelcore, Inc., Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Durham Industries, Inc., Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API