Brandon v. Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BRANCH, Chief Justice.
The Court of Appeals, in awarding plaintiff a new trial, held that “[t]he second issue, as it is phrased, should not have been tendered to the jury.” 46 N.C. App. at 479, 265 S.E. 2d at 501. The court stated that “it is uncontroverted that proofs of loss were filed. The defendant only contends they were incomplete.” Id. Defendant contends that the second issue was properly submitted since there was ample evidence tending to show that, while plaintiff eventually submitted forms entitled “Proofs of Loss,” he failed to “file with the defendant insurance company a proof of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Gerringer v. North Carolina Home InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
- McCollough v. Home Ins. Co. of N.Y.California Supreme Court · 1909
- Standard Life & Accident Insurance v. SchmaltzSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1899
- Boyd v. Bankers & Shippers Insurance CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
- Hicks Ex Rel. Mitchell v. Home Security Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Akzona, Inc. v. American Credit Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
- Drain v. United Services Life Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
- Smith v. North Carolina Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
- Daniel v. Pawtucket Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1986
- Brendle v. Shenandoah Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.