Legal Opinion
Rodgers v. Grow-Kiewit Corp.-MK Local 14
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 29, 1982No. 80 Civ. 1819 (RWS)PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Presently before the court in this action by William J. Rodgers, Sr. (“Rodgers”) against the joint venture employer, GrowKiewit Corp.-MK (“Grow-Kiewit”), Local 14 of the International Union of Operating Engineers (“Local 14” or “the Union”), of which Rodgers was a member, and Jack Messinger individually and as business manager of Local 14 (“Messinger”) are three post trial motions: Messinger, having made a motion for a directed verdict at the close of all the evidence, has moved pursuant to Rule 50(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for Judgment…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Brady v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Samuel Simblest v. Joseph MaynardCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
- Victor Bevevino v. M. S. SaydjariCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
- Wegman v. Dairylea Cooperative, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
- Beardsley v. . KilmerNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Schmitz v. SmentowskiNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1990
- Azby Brokerage, Inc. v. Allstate InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1988
- Hughes v. Patrolmen's Benevolent Association Of The City Of New York, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
- Hughes v. Patrolmen's Benevolent Ass'n of New York, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
- Sharma v. Skaarup Ship Management Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1988
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.