Legal Opinion

Sharma v. Skaarup Ship Management Corp.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided October 13, 1988No. 86 Civ. 3236 (LLS)PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

STANTON, District Judge.

Plaintiffs’ claims arise from a series of loan agreements they had with defendant Chemical Bank (“Chemical”) to finance three tankers. Plaintiffs claim that Chemical conspired with the other defendants to prevent plaintiffs from repaying or refinancing their loan obligations, with the result that ownership of the tankers was transferred to entities controlled by defendant Skaarup Ship Management Corporation (“SSMC”).

SSMC, Ole Skaarup and Bent Larsen (collectively, the “Skaarup defendants”) and Chemical have made separate motions to dismiss the amended…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Murphy v. American Home Products Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. Wood v. . Duff-GordonNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
  5. Burns Jackson Miller Summit & Spitzer v. LindnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1983

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Applied Equipment Corp. v. Litton Saudi Arabia Ltd.California Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Granite Partners, LP v. Bear, Stearns & Co. Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1998
  3. National Westminster Bank, U.S.A. v. RossDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1991
  4. Don King Productions, Inc. v. DouglasDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1990
  5. Sybil Young and Roderick Young v. United States Department of Justice, Sybil Young and Roderick Young v. Chemical Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API