Legal Opinion
Diviero v. Uniroyal Goodrich Tire Co.
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided April 4, 1996No. Civ 92-1151 PHX ROSPublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED ORDER
SILVER, District Judge.
Plaintiffs filed an action in State Court alleging that Defendant had manufactured a defective and unreasonably dangerous tire which caused an accident in which they incurred personal injuries. The matter was removed to Federal Court.
In May of 1995 Defendant moved in Li-mine to exclude Plaintiffs’ proffered tire ex pert, Mr. Loren John Forney, and requested a Federal Rule of Evidence 104(a) hearing. Concurrently, Defendant filed a Motion for Summary Judgment. A hearing was held on January 22, 1996 and the Court granted the Motion to Exclude Mr. Forney.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- H. Jerome Claar Ben Mar Maynard Young Donald Doll v. Burlington Northern Railroad Company, Dick Eggar Ray Ellison v. Burlington Northern Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Denise Thomas & Willie Lavon Thomas v. Newton International Enterprises Southern Shipping Management (Chile) Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- J.R. Maffei Richard Maffei Betty J. Maffei v. Northern Insurance Company of New York Maryland Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Shreve v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 2001
- Diviero v. Uniroyal Goodrich Tire Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Buck v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2011
- Hauck v. Michelin North America, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 2004
- Lux v. CoxDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1998
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.