Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Bruml v. Village of Brooklyn
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided May 3, 1933No. 23941PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDay, J.
The question presented is, When are general levies required in order to pay interest and principal on bonds issued in anticipation of collection of special assessments, the bonds not requiring payment solely from special assessment but providing that “the faith, credit and revenue of said Village are hereby irrevocably pledged for the prompt payment of the principal and interest thereof at maturity.”
The relator claims that general taxes should be levied coincidently and continuously with the levy of the special assessments. The respondent claims that general levies should be made only after…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Hitchcock v. GalvestonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Shepard v. BarronSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Colby v. City of MedfordOregon Supreme Court · 1917
- Klemm v. DavenportSupreme Court of Florida · 1930
- United States v. County of ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State ex rel. National City Bank v. Board of Education of Cleveland City School DistrictOhio Supreme Court · 1977
- City of Highland Park v. Dearborn TownshipMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
- State Ex Rel. Alden Corp. v. Village of SolonOhio Supreme Court · 1937
- State Ex Rel. Ohio National Bank v. Village of HudsonOhio Supreme Court · 1938
- The State Ex Rel. Stauss v. County of CuyahogaOhio Supreme Court · 1935
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.