Legal Opinion

State v. Edwards

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 10, 1984No. 400A83PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COPELAND, Justice.

The issue presented is whether defendant’s reprosecution for felonious breaking or entering with intent to commit larceny is barred by his earlier acquittal of the charge of larceny.

Defendant does not contend that he is barred from prosecution because he is being placed in jeopardy for the same offense. Rather, defendant contends that his acquittal on the larceny charge in the first trial determined matters of fact in his favor so as to collaterally estop the State from now proving him guilty of breaking or entering with the intent to commit larceny.

The doctrine of…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. United States v. Donna BallardCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
  3. United States v. Samuel B. Hewitt and Bobby Gene ChesserCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
  4. State v. ThompsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  5. Z. A. Adams and Jean Adams v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Ferrell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
  2. State v. HopeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
  3. State v. MaskeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2004
  4. State v. BellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
  5. State v. OdomCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API