Legal Opinion

State v. Hope

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided July 10, 1990No. 13720PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGlass, J.

The dispositive issue in this appeal is whether the state is barred by the double jeopardy clause from prosecuting the defendant for aiding and abetting murder after the defendant had been acquitted of conspiracy to commit capital felony murder and *571the lesser included offense of conspiracy to commit murder. Because an understanding of the facts of this case is necessary to examine its procedural history, we shall summarize the relevant evidence presented at the defendant’s first trial, prior to detailing the procedural history of the case.

Geraldine Burke wanted to have her third husband,…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. United States v. JornSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Grady v. CorbinSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. United States v. DinitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. JonesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  2. Jackson v. R. G. Whipple, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
  3. State v. JoyceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
  4. State v. CrawfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
  5. Apostoledes v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API