Legal Opinion
Pinnacle Group, Inc. v. Shrader
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
Decided January 21, 1992No. 9126SC92PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WALKER, Judge.
Respondents bring forth three questions for this Court’s review. First, they contend the arbitrators committed error when they (1) failed to compel production of certain audio tapes for expert analysis; (2) failed to compel answers to interrogatories; and (3) rushed the arbitration hearings to conclusion, thereby excluding certain material evidence.
Respondents’ first assignment of error is the arbitrators’ refusal to compel the production of the original audio tapes of the October 1987 conversations between Shrader and Folger for expert analysis. They contend that expert…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Tanglewood Land Co., Inc. v. ByrdSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- Fairchild & Co. v. Richmond, Fredericksburg & Potomac RailroadDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1981
- Burke County Public Schools Board of Education v. Shaver PartnershipSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- Grossman v. Laurence Handprints-N.J., Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Mead v. First Trust & Deposit Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Matter of Town of Silver CityNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1993
- Carpenter v. BrooksCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
- First Union Securities, Inc. v. LORELLICourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
- Revels v. Miss North Carolina Pageant Organization, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
- Capps v. VirreyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.