Legal Opinion

Feldman v. Arnold

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 15, 1924No. 23,814PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Taylor, C.

The trial court sustained a demurrer to the complaint on the ground that it failed to state a cause of action in favor of plaintiffs, and they appealed.

It appears from the complaint that the Farmers & Merchants State Bank of Montevideo, with a capital stock of $75,000 and deposits exceeding $500,000, held uncollectible paper exceeding $120,000 in amount, and was insolvent; and that the superintendent of banks had notified its officers that it would be closed and put in liquidation, unless sufficient new assets were provided to take care of its liabilities. It further appears from…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Harriet State Bank v. SamelsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
  2. Goedhard v. FolstadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
  3. Minneapolis Brewing Company v. MerrittDistrict Court, D. North Dakota · 1956
  4. Marquette Trust Co. v. DoyleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
  5. Cruickshank v. EllisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API