Legal Opinion

Marquette Trust Co. v. Doyle

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 8, 1929No. 27,122PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilson, C. J.

H. L. Bollum, one of the defendants, appealed from an order overruling defendants’ demurrer to the complaint, the order certifying the questions to be important and doubtful.

The demurrer was for insufficiency of the complaint, misjoinder of causes of action, and for another action pending. The action is to recover upon a guaranty which defendants gave plaintiffs.

On August 5,1925, plaintiffs made a contract with the Continental State Bank of Minneapolis, known as exhibit A, which provides for plaintiffs taking over the business of the state bank and specifies that certain of its assets are to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bryant v. LivermoreSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1874
  2. St. Paul Land Co. v. DaytonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
  3. Feldman v. ArnoldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
  4. Somers v. DawsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
  5. Bergmeier v. EisenmengerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. W. C. Shepherd Co., Inc. v. Royal Indemnity CoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1951
  2. Pierce v. Foley Bros., Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
  3. Holbert v. WermerskirchenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1941
  4. Loving & Associates, Inc. v. CarothersCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
  5. State Ex Rel. First Minneapolis Trust Co. v. FosseenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API