Legal Opinion
Automobile Banking Corp. v. Duffy-Mullen Motor Co.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Decided March 4, 1925No. Appeal, 34PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
by Keller, J.,
Joseph Cipilewski gave Duffy-Mullen Motor Co. his promissory note for $360.96, dated May 5, 1924, payable in twelve monthly installments of $30.08 each, beginning one month after date. It contained a warrant of attorney to confess judgment for the above sum, with 15 % attorney’s commission, release of errors and without stay of execution; and waived inquisition and condemnation of any real estate. The payee, Duffy-Mullen Motor Co., assigned this note by endorsement in writing to Automobile Banking Corporation. The assignment contained a guarantee by the Duffy-Mullen Motor…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Whitney v. HopkinsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1890
- Meyers & Joly v. FreilingSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
- Connay v. HalsteadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1873
- Jameson Piano Co. v. EarnestSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1917
- Hageman v. SalisberrySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1873
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Dime Bank Trust Co. of Pittston v. O'BoyleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- Allen Building & Loan Ass'n v. BargSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
- Allied Mills, Inc. v. Ultra Quality Eggs, Inc., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Bucks County1973
- Carlisle Trust Co. v. Group, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Cumberland County1935
- Pennsylvania Co. for Banking & Trusts v. Ernst, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Dauphin County1949
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.