Legal Opinion

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Roth

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 2, 1982No. 9, SC 28223PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM. This is a proceeding pursuant to ORS 1.420 and 1.430 and Article VII, (Amended), Section 8 of the Oregon Constitution to inquire into the conduct of a circuit court judge. The Commission on Judicial Fitness found, after a hearing, that Judge Phillip J. Roth had willfully violated a canon of the Code of Judicial Conduct and recommended to this court that Judge Roth be censured. ORS 1.420 provides in part:

“(1) Upon complaint from any person concerning the conduct of a judge or upon request of the Supreme Court, and after such investigation as the Commission on Judicial Fitness…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Matter of FieldOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Matter of SawyerOregon Supreme Court · 1979

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. In Re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against DemingWashington Supreme Court · 1987
  2. In Re KneiflNebraska Supreme Court · 1984
  3. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of SchenckOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Application of TaylorOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Matter of GorbyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1985

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API