Legal Opinion
Westside Cellular, Inc. v. Public Utilities Commission
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided December 26, 2002No. 2001-0960PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPfeifer, J.
Factual and Procedural Background
{¶ 1} Appellant, Westside Cellular, Inc., d.b.a. Cellnet, is a cellular telephone service reseller. As such, it purchases cellular service on a wholesale basis, rebrands the service, and markets it on a retail basis. On October 18, 1993, Cellnet filed a complaint with the Public Utilities Commission of Ohio against wholesale cellular service providers, including Cincinnati SMSA Limited Partnership, d.b.a. Ameritech Mobile (“Ameritech”). The final amended complaint consisted of ten counts asserting that Ameritech and another wholesale cellular service provider,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Dayton Power & Light Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1983
- At&T Communications of Ohio, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1990
- Ohio Edison Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1992
- AK Steel Corp. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- Cincinnati Bell Telephone Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2001
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Cleveland Mobile Radio Sales, Inc. v. Verizon WirelessOhio Supreme Court · 2007
- Satterfield v. Ameritech Mobile Communications, Inc. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2018
- New Par v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- Satterfield v. Ameritech Mobile Communications, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2017
- Westside Cellular, Inc. v. Pub. Util. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 2003
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.