Legal Opinion

Satterfield v. Ameritech Mobile Communications, Inc. (Slip Opinion)

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 18, 2018No. 2017-0684PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKennedy, J.

*463 *146 {¶ 1} In this discretionary appeal from a judgment of the Eighth District Court of Appeals, we consider the parameters established by R.C. 4905.61 regarding the parties that have standing to bring a treble-damages action pursuant to that statute. Here, appellee, Intermessage Communications ("Intermessage"), and members of a proposed class of retail cellular-telephone-service subscribers seek to recover treble damages under R.C. 4905.61 for regulatory violations committed in the mid-1990s when those regulatory violations-as determined by the Public Utilities Commission of Ohio…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. PariagOhio Supreme Court · 2013
  2. State ex rel. Solomon v. Board of Trustees of the Police & Firemen's Disability & Pension FundOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Symmes Township Board of Trustees v. SmythOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Jones v. Action Coupling & Equipment, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Milligan v. Ohio Bell Telephone Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Cincinnati v. Twang, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2021
  2. Goodman v. Dan Rich, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2021
  3. Goree v. Northland Auto Ents. Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2020
  4. Aramark Corp. v. HarrisOhio Supreme Court · 2025
  5. State v. HaynesOhio Court of Appeals · 2020

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API