Satterfield v. Ameritech Mobile Communications, Inc. (Slip Opinion)
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtKennedy, J.
*463 *146 {¶ 1} In this discretionary appeal from a judgment of the Eighth District Court of Appeals, we consider the parameters established by R.C. 4905.61 regarding the parties that have standing to bring a treble-damages action pursuant to that statute. Here, appellee, Intermessage Communications ("Intermessage"), and members of a proposed class of retail cellular-telephone-service subscribers seek to recover treble damages under R.C. 4905.61 for regulatory violations committed in the mid-1990s when those regulatory violations-as determined by the Public Utilities Commission of Ohio…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- State v. PariagOhio Supreme Court · 2013
- State ex rel. Solomon v. Board of Trustees of the Police & Firemen's Disability & Pension FundOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- Symmes Township Board of Trustees v. SmythOhio Supreme Court · 2000
- Jones v. Action Coupling & Equipment, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2003
- Milligan v. Ohio Bell Telephone Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Cincinnati v. Twang, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2021
- Goodman v. Dan Rich, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2021
- Goree v. Northland Auto Ents. Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2020
- Aramark Corp. v. HarrisOhio Supreme Court · 2025
- State v. HaynesOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.