Legal Opinion
Trout Brook South Condominium Ass'n v. Harleysville Worcester Insurance
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided February 5, 2014No. Civ. No. 12-2888 (RHK/JSM)PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
RICHARD H. KYLE, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
This insurance-coverage action arises out of hail damage sustained by a town-home development, Plaintiff Trout Brook South Condominium Association (“Trout Brook”), in 2010. Trout Brook alleges that its insurer, Defendant Harleysville Worcester Insurance Company (“Harleysville”), failed to pay all of the damages it is entitled to recover under its policy. Presently before the Court is Harleysville’s Motion for Summary Judgment. For the *1037reasons that follow, the Court will deny its Motion.
BACKGROUND
Most of the relevant facts…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Ricci v. DeStefanoSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Beard v. BanksSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Torgerson v. City of RochesterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
- Weitz Co., LLC v. Lloyd's of LondonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
- Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co. v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Windridge of Naperville Condo v. Philadelphia Indemnity InsuranCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
- Selective Ins. Co. of S.C. v. SelaDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2018
- Walnut Creek Townhome Association v. Depositors Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 2018
- Bertisen v. Travelers Home and Marine Insurance Company, TheDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2024
- Jamestown Villas Homeowners Association v. State Farm Fire and Casualty CompanyDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2025
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.