Legal Opinion

Heisler v. Thomas

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 28, 1982No. 55888PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DOOLIN, Justice:

In late 1978, Appellee Max E. Heisler (“owner”) prepared to sell two tracts of land in Stillwater. He believed the tracts to be zoned for multifamily residences, relying on a zoning map prepared by Appellant City of Stillwater (“the City”). Protests by neighboring landowners led to the discovery of a discrepancy in the zoning map: the property in question had originally been zoned for single family residences and had never been rezoned.

Owner then requested that the City’s Board of Commissioners rezone the property to allow twice the number of dwelling units. Owner did not…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. O'ROURKE v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1969
  2. Oklahoma City v. BarclaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
  3. Botchlett v. City of BethanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
  4. Keaton v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  5. Cauvel v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Mid-Continent Life Insurance Co. v. City of Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
  2. Opinion No., Oklahoma Attorney General Reports2006
  3. Opinion No. (1997), Oklahoma Attorney General Reports1997
  4. Opinion No. (2006), Oklahoma Attorney General Reports2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API