Legal Opinion

Cauvel v. City of Tulsa

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 30, 1962No. 39316PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAVISON, Justice.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the lower court affirming the action of the Board of Adjustment of the City of Tulsa in sustaining the order of the City Building Inspector directing the plaintiff in error to cease using his residence in violation of the City’s zoning ordinance. Plaintiff in error will be referred to as plaintiff.

The record reflects that plaintiff was, during the time herein mentioned, a professional engineer and registered under the laws of the State of Oklahoma. He is also referred to as a consulting engineer. For a number of years plaintiff carried on…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Beveridge v. Harper & Turner Oil TrustSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  2. Evans v. Woodmen Accident Ass'nSupreme Court of Kansas · 1918
  3. City of Tulsa v. MizelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Jackson v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
  2. Preston v. City of StillwaterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
  3. Heisler v. ThomasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
  4. Jackson v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API