People v. De Martini
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco and from an order refusing a new trial. George H. Cabaniss, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtKerrigan, J.
The defendant -was charged by information with" the crime of pandering, committed in the city and county of San Francisco, in that he did willfully and feloniously, and by promise of a salary of thirty-five dollars per month, and by other devices, cause, induce, persuade and encourage a certain woman (naming her) to become an inmate of a house of prostitution. He was tried, convicted, and sentenced. The appeal is from the judgment and from an order denying defendant’s motion for a new trial.
The information charges the offense in the language of the statute, stating also the place where it was…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- People v. GordonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1882
- People v. FrigerioCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Demartini v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- State v. HoyleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- People v. JonesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- People v. AndersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- People v. WaidCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- People v. WeltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- People v. AndersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.