Edwards v. GE Lighting Systems, Inc.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
STEELMAN, Judge.
Where plaintiff’s forecast of evidence failed to establish a claim under Woodson v. Rowland, the trial court erred in denying defendant’s motion for summary judgment.
I. Factual and Procedural Background
Defendant General Electric Lighting Systems, Inc. (“GELS”) is a subsidiary of defendant General Electric Company (“G.E.”). GELS manufactures industrial and highway lights through a process which requires metal parts to be baked in annealing ovens in an oxygen-free gas which contains a high concentration of carbon monoxide. The oxygen-free gas is produced by an exothermic…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Veazey v. City of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
- Collingwood v. General Electric Real Estate Equities, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
- Woodson v. RowlandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
- Jeffreys v. Raleigh Oaks Joint VentureCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
- Bockweg v. AndersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1993
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Estate of Vaughn v. Pike Electric, LLCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
- One Beacon Insurance v. United Mechanical Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
- Blackburn v. CarboneCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
- Blow v. DSM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
- Panos v. Timco Engine Center, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.