Legal Opinion

Edwards v. GE Lighting Systems, Inc.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 4, 2008No. COA08-219PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEELMAN, Judge.

Where plaintiff’s forecast of evidence failed to establish a claim under Woodson v. Rowland, the trial court erred in denying defendant’s motion for summary judgment.

I. Factual and Procedural Background

Defendant General Electric Lighting Systems, Inc. (“GELS”) is a subsidiary of defendant General Electric Company (“G.E.”). GELS manufactures industrial and highway lights through a process which requires metal parts to be baked in annealing ovens in an oxygen-free gas which contains a high concentration of carbon monoxide. The oxygen-free gas is produced by an exothermic…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Veazey v. City of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  2. Collingwood v. General Electric Real Estate Equities, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
  3. Woodson v. RowlandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  4. Jeffreys v. Raleigh Oaks Joint VentureCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
  5. Bockweg v. AndersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1993

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Estate of Vaughn v. Pike Electric, LLCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
  2. One Beacon Insurance v. United Mechanical Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
  3. Blackburn v. CarboneCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
  4. Blow v. DSM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
  5. Panos v. Timco Engine Center, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API