Legal Opinion

Key Bank of Central New York v. Stickles

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 2, 1989PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs, in accordance with the following memorandum: Special Term properly denied plaintiffs motion for summary judgment with respect to the first cause of action set forth in plaintiff’s complaint. The affidavit submitted by defendants in opposition to plaintiff’s motion was sufficient to raise an issue of fact concerning the commercial reasonableness of plaintiffs sale of the repossessed collateral (see, UCC 9-504 [3]; Marine Midland Bank v Kristin Inti., 141 AD2d 259, 264; National Bank v Gregory, 85 AD2d 839, 840;…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Marine Midland Bank, N. A. v. Kristin International Ltd.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  2. National Bank v. GregoryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
  3. Madaro Trading Corp. v. National Bank of North AmericaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. HSBC Bank USA v. Economy Steel, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API