Benedek v. Mechanical Products, Inc.
Michigan Supreme Court
1Dissent
This is an appeal by plaintiff from an order granting defendant's motion to dismiss count 1 of his declaration, on the ground that the separate cause of action as therein pleaded is unenforceable under the provisions of the statute of frauds, 3 Comp. Laws 1929, § 13417 (Stat. Ann. § 26.922), and that such defect appears on the face of the declaration.
In count 1 of his declaration, plaintiff, Dr. Elek K. Benedek, a resident of Chicago, Illinois, who describes himself as an experienced mechanical and consulting engineer and a specialist in fluid pressure variable speed pumps and transmissions,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Toomy v. DunphyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Dodge v. BloodMichigan Supreme Court · 1941
- Paul v. GrahamMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
- Cochran v. StamanMichigan Supreme Court · 1918
- Badger v. FinlaysonMichigan Supreme Court · 1922