Cisco Banking Co. v. Keystone Pipe & Supply Co.
Texas Commission of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtShort, J.
The Vacuum Oil Company, a foreign corporation, brought this suit against the Liberty Refining Company to recover certain damages based upon the alleged breach of a contract and for the appointment of a receiver. In compliance with the application of the original plaintiff, receivers were appointed, and a master in chancery also, to pass upon the validity of claims and priority of liens asserted by the creditors of the Liberty Refining Company, among which were the plaintiff in error, Cisco Banking Company, and the Keystone Pipe & Supply Company, the defendant in error herein.
The claim of the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Shirras & Others v. Caig & MitchelSupreme Court of the United States · 1812
- Fitzhugh v. Franco-Texas Land Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1891
- Patterson v. . RobinsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Tapia v. DemartiniCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Gulf Pipe Line Co. v. LasaterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Parkdale State Bank v. McCordCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968
- Crabb v. William Cameron & Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1933
- Regold Manufacturing Company v. MacCabeesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1961
- Kaspar v. Cockrell-Riggins Lighting CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1974
- L & N CONSULTANTS, INC. v. Sikes, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1983
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.