Legal Opinion
California v. Emhart Corp.
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided February 27, 1976No. M.D.L. No. 45 and Civ. No. H-61PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
BLUMENFELD, District Judge.
On April 25, 1973, the State of California filed this action in the United States District Court for the Central District of California, alleging that the defendants had conspired to restrain trade, in violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1 (1970). Jurisdiction exists pursuant to Section 4 of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. § 15 (1970). The action was eventually transferred to this court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407, to be consolidated with the other actions pending here. In re Master Key Antitrust Litigation, M.D.L.…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Poller v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- American Pipe & Construction Co. v. UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Annette Heyman v. Commerce and Industry Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co. v. New Jersey Wood Finishing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1965
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Wright v. CalifanoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1979
- Gregg Communications Systems, Inc. v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1983
- In re Master Key Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1976
- Univac Dental Co. v. Dentsply International, Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
- Wright v. CalifanoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1979