Univac Dental Co. v. Dentsply International, Inc.

ORDER

CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER, District Judge.

AND NOW, this 27th day of April, 2010, upon consideration of the report of the magistrate judge (Doc. 115) recommending that defendant’s motions in limine (Docs. 99, 98, 100) be denied, with one exception, and, following an independent review of the record, it appearing that the motions in the above-captioned matter request that certain evidence be excluded at trial,1 and that the magistrate judge recommended denial of defendant’s motions,2 without prejudice to the *192rights of the parties to object at trial to the admissibility of such evidence, and…