Legal Opinion

In re Master Key Antitrust Litigation

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided August 17, 1976No. M.D.L. No. 45PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*109RULING ON MOTION TO EXCLUDE DEFENDANT EATON CORPORATION’S DESIGNATION OF TRIAL TESTIMONY

BLUMENFELD, District Judge.

Defendant Eaton has noticed its intention to introduce a record of the prior testimony of A. H. Brownell, Roger A. Graham and William H. Neale at the trial on the issue of liability which is scheduled to commence on September 14, 1976.

Plaintiffs object to the submission of this prior testimony, and have moved in limine to exclude it on the ground that it is inadmissible hearsay.

The issue revolves around an interpretation of Rule 804(b)(1), Fed. R. of Evid., which allows prior…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. California v. Emhart Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1976

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Zenith Radio Corp. v. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1980
  2. Bolden v. CarterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
  3. Carpenter v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1984
  4. In Re Screws Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1981
  5. In Re IBM Peripheral Edp Devices, Etc.District Court, N.D. California · 1978

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API