Legal Opinion

Waddell v. Schwarz

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided November 5, 1981No. 59926PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This case is before us to review the decision of the District Court of Appeal, Fourth District, in Schwarz v. Waddell, 389 So.2d 210 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980), which conflicts with Sokolsky v.Kuhn, 386 So.2d 806 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980). The Fourth District holds that although the ex-wife was seeking garnishment to satisfy an order of the trial court for child support which was encompassed by section 61.12, Florida Statutes (1979), the requirement of section 222.12, Florida Statutes (1979), that she controvert the head of the family claim made by her ex-husband, whose wages she sought to garnishee,…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Miami Herald Pub. Co. v. PayneSupreme Court of Florida · 1978
  2. Sokolsky v. KuhnSupreme Court of Florida · 1981
  3. Sokolsky v. KuhnDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
  4. Schwarz v. WaddellDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Sokolsky v. KuhnSupreme Court of Florida · 1981
  2. Cadle Co. v. G & G ASSOCIATESDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
  3. Kane v. Stewart Tilghman Fox & Bianchi, P.A.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
  4. Schwarz v. WaddellDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  5. Cadle Co. v. G & G ASSOCIATESDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API